BRINGING HISTORY TO REAL LIFE: ALTERNATIVE HISTORY LEARNING BASED ON FACTUAL INTERPRETATIONS RECONSTRUCTION ZEITGEIST FOR REAL LIFE ACTIONS (FIRZA)

Firza Azzam Fadilla, Daya Negri Wijaya, Aditya Nugroho Widiadi

Abstract


The FIRZA (Factual, Interpretations, Reconstruction, Zeitgeist for Real Life Actions) document-based history learning model was developed based on history learning problems; a). Lack of understanding of historical concepts in teachers and students, b). Problems in history textbooks that contain elements of subjectivity, c). Lack of use of primary sources of history. The research method used is research and development (R&D) with the design of Dick & Carey (2015) and using communicative action theory as a foundation for developing the FIRZA learning model. The purpose of this research is to develop a document-based history learning model, namely with historical methodology, and coverage of historical skills strands. The result of the research is that the FIRZA learning model has 5 syntaxes. This model aims to train students' thinking through learning strategies and methods with historiography exercises and evaluation through document-based questions to support understanding of historical concepts, facts, and narrative skills. FIRZA learning model was developed for interactive and progressive learning by encouraging students to be able to imagine, live the spirit of the times, and dialogue with the symptoms of past events to support historical awareness and implementation of historical thinking skills in real action. The results of this study are; 1). FIRZA learning model is effective for use in school education and higher education; 2). The results of this learning model can support the effectiveness of historical teaching materials for students with data ranging from 95% of students being able to understand and contextualize the material learned in real life.


Keywords


FIRZA Learning Model, Document Based Learning, Historiography Practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah. T & Surjomihardjo. A, (1985). Ilmu Sejarah Dan Historiografi: Arah dan Perspektif. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Ankersmit. F.R, (1987). Refleksi Tentang Sejarah: Pendapat-Pendapat Modern Tentang Filsafat Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Capaian Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Tahun (2022).

Collingwood. R.G, (1946). The Idea Of History. London: Oxford University Press.

Curaming. R.A, (2020). Power and knowledge in Southeast Asia: state and scholars in Indonesia and the Philippines. New York: Routledge.

Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2015) The systematic design of instruction. Eighth edition. Boston: Pearson.

Fleming. T, (2012). Habermas, Critical Theory and Education. Conference Pedagogika krytyczna dzis: Pytania o teorie i praktyke (Critical theory today: Questions about theory and practice).

Garvey. B & Krug. M, (2015). Model-Model Pembelajaran Sejarah di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Gottschalk. L, (1986). Mengerti Sejarah. Jakarta: UI Press.

Habermas. J, (1984). The theory of communicative action vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Herlina. N, (2022). Metode Sejarah. Bandung: Satya Historika.

Kartodirdjo. S, (2019). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial Dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Kuntowijoyo, (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Lopez. L & Gonzalez, (2019). Language Learning Goals Objetivos de Aprendizaje de Lenguas. Biannual Publication. Vol. 1, No. 1 (48-52).

Murti, et.al, (2018). Studi Komparasi antara Tes Testlet dan Uraian dalam Mengukur Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Gombong. Unnes Physics Education Journal. Vol. 7, No. 1, (23-31).

Safitry. M, et.al, (2021). Buku Panduan Guru Sejarah Untuk SMA/SMK Kelas XI. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Sayono. J, (2013). Pembelajaran Sejarah Di Sekolah: Dari Pragmatif Ke Idealis. Jurnal: Sejarah Dan Budaya. 7(1), 9-17.

Sayono. J, (2023). Pengembangan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Praktik Historiografi: Strategi Menciptakan Pembelajaran Sejarah Yang Menarik Dan Menantang. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Sjamsuddin. H, (2012). Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, Teaching American History Evaluation: Final Report, Washington, D.C., (2011). http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html.

UCLA History. (2019). Historical thinking standards. Retrieved from Public History Initiative website: Historical Thinking Standards | Public History Initiative (ucla.edu).

Widiadi. A.N, et.al, (2022). Merdeka Berpikir Sejarah: Alternatif Strategi Implementasi Keterampilan Berpikir Sejarah Dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya. Vol. 16, No. 1, (235-247).

Wineburg. S, (2006). Berpikir Historis: Memetakan Masa Depan, Mengajarkan Masa Lalu. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Wineburg. S, (2010). Thinking like a historian. Teaching with primary sources quarterly, 3(1), 2-4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v16i2.59118

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 58 times
PDF - 11 times

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v16i2.59118.g25827

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JUPIIS: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial

Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License