Eleventh Grade Students’ Ability in Writing Formal Invitation Letter at SMA N 10 Medan

Ruth Meilati Panjaitan, Tiarnita Maria Sarjani Br Siregar

Abstract


The objective of this research is to describe the eleventh grade students’ writing ability and difficulties in writing formal invitation letter at SMA N 10. This study used a mixed method in which the researcher used both quantitative and qualitative methods to interpret and describe the phenomena in the data. Data collected through written tests and interview. The written test results were analyzed following the writing components from Brown (2004) which consist of content, organization, grammatical, vocabulary and mechanic. Then interviews were conducted with students regarding students' difficulties in writing according to difficulties in psychological, linguistic (grammatical and vocabulary), and cognitive (content, organization, and mechanics). The population of this study was eleventh grade students. The sample of this study were XI IPA 1 which consisted of 33 students. The research findings show several things. The first point is that the average student score in writing formal invitation letters is 76.34 which is classified in the good level. The component that students wrote best was content with an average of 3.2. Then the lowest component written by students was organization with an average of 2.7. Therefore, students' ability to write formal invitation letters is classified at the good level. Following the results of the written test analysis, from interview with students, it was found that students experienced difficulties in writing. Students experienced difficulties in writing in accordance with psychological, linguistic (grammar and vocabulary) and cognitive (content, organization and mechanics) aspects.

Keywords


Writing Ability, Writing Difficulties, Formal Invitation Letter, Senior High School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amelya, N. Samtidar. Baa, S. (2022) An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Writing Narrative Text. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education. 1(4). 412-422.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2004). Language assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Byrne, D. (1997). Teaching Writing Skills. London: Longman Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

David Nunan. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York:Mc.Graw-Hill Company.

Faramarzi, S., Elekaei, A., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2015). Genre-based discourse analysis of wedding invitation cards in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 662.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Longman.

Harris, John. 1993. Introducing Writing. London: penguin English.

Syamsudin dan Damiyanti, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Cipta Pustaka Media, 2011.

Wren, P., & Martin, H. (1996). High School English Grammar and Composition Revised Edition. New Delhi: S. Chand & Company LTD.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v13i1.65602

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 43 times
PDF - 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ruth Meilati Panjaitan, Tiarnita Maria Sarjani Br Siregar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.